Who owns celtic park
You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account.
You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Search Search for: Go. Financial Integrity , Football , Moral Integrity. Repayment of initial Co-operative Bank loan Fergus McCann, talking of when he bought Celtic, says that the Co-operative Bank gave them a loan on much better terms than the Bank of Scotland. Share this: Twitter Facebook.
Like this: Like Loading Reply to this comment. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here AlCapone 7, Posted June 20, Posted June 20, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options Replies 53 Created 7 yr Last Reply 7 yr. Top Posters In This Topic 4 5 5 4. KingKirk 20, Posted June 20, OlegKuznetsov 10, Posted June 20, The press should be asking these questions.
Kaiser Wull Posted June 20, Was this before or after the abolition of feudal tenure? From now on, I think we can refer to it as Willie Haughey Park. If that's too long, then Willie Park will do.
It does seem apt. The Educator 1, Posted June 20, Just think how much he would have made if the M74 had been routed through it. Join the conversation You can post now and register later. Reply to this topic Insert image from URL. Go to topic listing. Upcoming Events No upcoming events found. New Manager Thread - Poll Added. Kent to villa? Rangers Picture Thread. Hibs Semi. Sign In Sign Up. The same night that Michael McDonald had issued his statement through the club, Dominic Keane , the club secretary, resigned after a 4 hour meeting with other members of the board.
Keane was said to be furious at the manner in which Haughey had been removed from the Board. Dominic Keane's departure was a more serious matter given his executive role and his representation of Celtic at SFA meetings. Keane refused to discuss the matter further publicly however McCann was drawn into a comment. He said, "I understand he was not in agreement with the process by which Mr Haughey had to be removed. However, the corporate structure of Celtic required the decision of the plc board, which was unanimous and reflected their responsibilities to all shareholders and supporters.
This was revealing in that there appeared to be a split within the plc and the non-executive sides of the Board, with the plc's directorate retaining complete confidence in McCann and his actions. The travails of Celtic continued yesterday and the club board — the football board that is — met for five hours yesterday to discuss the departure of director Willie Haughey.
After earlier confusion, Haughey tendered his resignation to the club through his lawyer, but still refused to accept the allegations being laid at his door by managing director Fergus McCann of leaking stories to newspapers. The Haughey affair seems to have become so central to the club's thinking that a proposed meeting with under siege manager Tommy Burns was postponed. Burns, whose own future has been open to question, was scheduled to meet the directors yesterday.
Instead, the five-hour meeting concentrated on the problem of the director who had left. I understand that other directors feel a sense of disquiet over the entire handling of Haughey's departure. And the Glasgow businessman, who put up 1m of his own money to help the rescue operation, will remain a source of embarrassment to McCann. As a major investor, Haughey's continued presence at Celtic Park is guaranteed.
0コメント