Who invented aadhar card

These databases are still under the law of that department. And there are laws to prevent that sharing from happening. Every sub-activity has some confidentiality requirement. Instead of having a larger conversation about creating a more secure digital ecosystem, you think Aadhaar is being demonised? India needs a modern data protection and privacy law, because today there are many, many sources of digital data. You have your phone, when you move from a feature phone to a smartphone, there is a dramatic increase in the level of data that somebody is able to gather about you.

So the smartphone itself is a huge risk from a privacy point of view. When you use the internet, other people are reading your emails and parsing your emails to figure out what your interests are. Today, we have a proliferation of CCTV cameras in malls, ATMs, hotels, bars, and everywhere, all of which are recording your behaviour, your activities.

India needs a modern data protection and privacy law because today there are many, many sources of digital data. So we definitely need a modern data protection and privacy law. I actually worked with the government and came out with the first draft. When I go and ask for my pension, I give my Aadhaar number. But nevertheless you are using it in various ways.

I mean, I use it all the time as a photo ID. See privacy and convenience go hand in hand. All of us give up a bit of privacy for convenience. I mean, I can use any ID, for example, while entering the airport. I happen to use Aadhaar ID because it is convenient. We have always said that the proper use of Aadhaar for authentication should be online.

I saw that. First of all, if somebody does three authentications and then it goes through, they count that as three attempts and not one. So there are some issues with the data itself. They, first of all, do an Aadhaar fingerprint authentication, which works most of the time. They also have an iris authentication as a backup.

They have OTP [one-time password] authentication on the phone as a second backup. Countries around the world looked on to see if it would work. Today, 1. It became near impossible in India to buy a cellphone contract or open a bank account, for example, without providing an Aadhaar number.

On Wednesday, that began to change. Each user receives a card with that number on it, which can be cross-referenced with the biometric data held in a database.

An Aadhaar card is not a proof of citizenship—but citizens are required to provide it to receive welfare payments and social services. The idea behind Aadhaar was to create a centralized system for the whole of India reliant on one form of recognizable ID, rather than the old, decentralized system of birth certificates and ration cards which were vulnerable to loss and damage, and which left marginalized people—particularly the rural poor—struggling to obtain state services.

Broadly, yes. The technology behind the system works for the majority of Indians. Taking this one step further, Ajay Bhushan Pandey, UIDAI's CEO, said that breaking "one bit" of the Aadhaar encryption would take more time than the age of the universe and the fastest supercomputer on Earth nevermind the fact that the universe is estimated to be nearly 14 billion years old.

The result of the ' challenge ' was up in the air, but the government did get some ammunition in its side by way of Bill Gates, who claimed Aadhaar did not have any privacy issue and he would move the World Bank to have other countries emulate it.

Between the continued denial, confusing statements meant to advocate faith in the programme and FIRs being filed against whistleblowers, privacy activists were not convinced by the way the government and the UIDAI were handling the reports of Aadhaar data leaks.

Emboldened by the Supreme Court's Right to Privacy verdict, they decided to move the court to settle the Aadhaar matter once and for all.

While the court was hearing petitions concerning Aadhaar on a case-by-case basis for a while, it was in the Fall of that the apex court agreed to hear a plea on the validity of the Aadhaar Act and set up a 5-judge bench to hear all petitions on the programme.

One of the first things the apex court did was have the deadline for linking Aadhaar with various schemes to March 31, As rolled around, all eyes turned to the apex court as it was to give its verdict on two major matters in the country: Babri Masjid and Aadhaar.

Not long after resuming operations, the apex court pulled up the UP government over Aadhaar for homeless people, asking them if the people did not exist for the government. During the legal battle around Aadhaar, the petitioners against it relied on arguments surrounding people being forced to part with personal data without any guarantee of safeguards to get an Aadhaar card, an argument that did not hold much weight with the apex court.

The apex court held that there was a need to balance an individual's privacy and the State's responsibility and that the Aadhaar Act could not be declared unconstitutional because of citizens being denied services for want of the ID card. All the while, the Centre maintained that it would not deny people their due if they lacked an Aadhaar. In March, the apex court indefinitely delayed the last date for linking Aadhaar to services, until the bench handling the petitions delivers its verdict.

Continuing its arguments, the Centre quoted Rajiv Gandhi's statement that only 15 paise of each rupee spent for the people actually reaches them to defend Aadhaar. In March, the apex court expressed concern about bringing people " face to face " with authorities through Aadhaar, saying that the State should reach them to accord the benefits of welfare schemes. Later, the apex court and the Centre had a strong exchange in regards to the Supreme Court order of mandatory verification of SIMs and how the Centre used it as a tool to make Aadhaar mandatory for the task.

Finally, in May, the apex court decided to reserve its verdict on the Aadhaar matter. Bounce turns old scooters into electric vehicles. Why African students overstay in Bengaluru.

Recycled medals, podiums: Tokyo passes sustainable test. In , at the age of forty-five, Sharma went to the University of California to acquire a Masters in, well, computer science. Get stories of change makers and innovators from the startup ecosystem in your inbox. Please fill in this field.

You have been successfully registered for our daily newsletter. At first look, Sharma is the quintessential bureaucrat, polite yet foreboding. Sharma says that he had been transferred nine times in seven years in Jharkhand. Luckily, for four of those years he had additional charge of information technology, so the experiments continued. He recalls his first meeting with Nilekani at the Maurya Sheraton hotel on 1 July vividly. I knew it was going to be tech-driven. For me, it would have been another posting — one where I would work in an area of my interest.

I have to manage the ecosystem. The second person Nilekani met was M. He jumped at the opportunity to work in a new and unique project. What it needed was that all-critical component of CFO, not just someone qualified to be a chief financial officer but one who understood the intricacies of oversight and accountability within the multi-layered systems that make up the government.